This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
For many financial advisors, a core part of the retirementplanning process involves simulating whether the client's assets will last through retirement. That emotional connection supports confidence and increases the likelihood that the client will stick with their plan and stay committed through both good markets and bad.
investmentnews.com) Research The problematic math of passing down generational wealth. blogs.cfainstitute.org) How life events affect retirementplanning. investmentecosystem.com) Reflections on eight years of running a financial planning practice.
citywire.com) Advisers Justin Fitzpatrick, "Retirementplanning that rejects success/failure framing can help clients understand that a realistic retirement journey involves not failure, but adjustments." thinkadvisor.com) Solo 401(k) contribution math can be tricky. obliviousinvestor.com)
When planning for retirement, it’s effectively impossible to precisely forecast the performance and timing of future investment returns, which in turn makes it challenging to accurately predict a plan’s success or failure.
When you get it wrong, it crushes your retirementplans. My own track record at making big calls is pretty damned good, but none of our clients wants me slinging around their retirement monies based on my gut instinct. The less it matters, the easier it is to be bold and outside of the mainstream.4 More on this later.
This approach typically provides greater benefits to those who have significant assets and high taxable income in retirement. Consider your next steps carefully and find a strategy that is consistent with your retirementplanning goals and wealth management objectives.
First, is the math right based on my numbers? If we guess just 2 billion people, and that is just a guess, and divide that into the 15.2 million Bitcoin, I think that works out to just under 1/100th of a Bitcoin per person, which works out to less than $100 per person at the current price. How can it solve anyone's problem?
Having an income plan is key for your retirementplanning. Is an annuity something you should consider as a part of your retirementplan and a way to protect what you have? It’s important to have the right strategy in place when it comes to taking out your retirement income.
If that money is in an IRA, that is going to change your math considerably due to having to withdraw all of that inherited IRA within 10 years. Maybe you have very few moving parts or have many more moving parts but it is important to realize that no one's retirementplan will be done in by everything going exactly as planned.
It's been a while since this sort of thing was relevant for my day job so something could have changed, weeklies didn't exist for example, but if my math is correct then it was way over exposed which would account for last week's decline in the fund price. Please leave a comment if I did the work incorrectly.
3] So, it’s easy math: the less you work, the less you’ll earn. Next, try to hold off on filing for Social Security benefits until you reach full retirement age. Lastly, it is crucial that individuals planning to earn Social Security monitor their earnings and check for mistakes once enrolled.
Some of these relationships are with people who want to retire or who are already retired. Math has no emotion, but people do. Mindsets People who are comfortable in their own skin seem to adapt best to retirement. Most of us can figure the rate of return on money. But the higher up a person has gone, the harder it is.
There was an article on LinkedIn (via Abnormal Returns) by Victor Haghani that dug into the math working against leveraged ETFs. Eric Balchunas from Bloomberg was baffled because the 1x version only has $60 million in AUM and trades about $1 million per day.
And checking in on the GraniteShares YieldBoost SPY ETF (YSPY) that sells put spreads on a levered S&P 500 ETF; Yes, that is a rough start, clearly, but interestingly the math checks out. YSPY sells put spreads on a 3x fund. Oddly, the fund page no longer mentioned targeting a 2x outcome, it appears to now say 3x.
James and Pamela’s Big Dream Excerpt from The Smart Person’s Guide to Financial Planning & Investments: A Simple and Straightforward Approach to Understanding Your Personal Finances By Michael J. Their retirementplan is strong, their kids are independent, and they are debt-free. So—problem solved, right? Well, actually, no.
One advisor noted that these events draw not only current clients but also curious prospects who are actively exploring retirementplanning options. Tax Strategy Workshops Workshops like “Creating Tax Efficient Retirement Strategies” attract attendees who are serious about their financial future.
Do the math, it would be a fantastic long term result but very difficult to pull off. Maybe the model providers don't really want their models to differentiate. Something like a 75/50 portfolio might fit in the discussion of endowment style. 75/50 seeks to capture 75% of the market's upside with only half the downside.
The importance of compounding interest can’t be emphasized enough. Let’s say I have $100,000 in my retirement fund and I make 5% interest. The math, despite Einstein’s interpretation, is really fairly simple. Then I have $105,000 gathering 5% interest in my account, and the next year I make $5,250.
Self-employment tax calculations and considerations When examining the math behind self-employment taxes , the total 15.3% Self-employed individuals enjoy unique advantages when it comes to health insurance and retirementplanning. rate is comprised of two components: 12.4% for Medicare, which has no earnings cap.
And then just a little math, the "guarantee" based on the 50/50 allocation would be 2.5% If you're trying to do something as simple as 50% in T-bills now yielding 5% and one equity proxy, don't make that one equity proxy a narrow bet like tech stocks. SSO is 2X S&P 500 and SPHB is the Invesco S&P 500 High Beta ETF.
The way Portfolios 1 and 2 are weighted, the math works for being a 60/40 portfolio and then from there we add portable alpha/capital efficiency/return stacking. As I read the FT article, I had a thought about how to try to make the fund work as part of diversified portfolio, not the entire portfolio.
The simple 40 year trade for bonds of "number go up" is finished and as a matter of math, can't be repeated. The diversification benefits of intermediate and longer term bonds is not what it used to be. Taking volatility out of a fixed income portfolio is fairly simple.
Simple math, it looks like the carry index has compounded at less than 3%. This next chart from Bloomberg compares just the carry component of the FOXY fund to the S&P 500 and T-Bills. The black line for carry looks like it is somewhat uncorrelated which is different than negatively correlated. The red line for T-bills is price only.
If you’re good with math, then turning to financial planning or accounting or opening up a similar company could be one of the best recession proof businesses to start! Financial planning services Financial advisors and planners are essential, especially during times of economic uncertainty.
The article devoted a good amount of space to bond market math, focusing on the pain of owning the iShares 20+ Year Treasury ETF (TLT) and bond funds in general. I've been like a broken record for years on the need to avoid bonds that have any sort of duration or at least be extremely underweight duration versus the typical benchmarks.
A harsh reality is that $50,000 is not a retirement fund but it is a pretty robust emergency fund. We've gone over the math before that starting as late as 55 can catch a lot of the way up if they can afford to save a very high percentage of their income.
Generally they all plan to work to 70 or beyond out of necessity. There was an odd and I believe inaccurate emphasis on workplace retirementplans pivoting from defined benefit plans (pensions) to defined contribution plans (401k) starting around the turn of the century. That is Rooster. Rooster loves duck toys.
Social Security RetirementPlanning . While there always seems to be a future funding shortfall for Social Security, it’s a political problem, not a math problem. Please contact us if you’d like to discuss your financial plan. The post Worried about your future Social Security benefits?
Simple math is that this person needs to save $23/yr to come up with that additional $350,000. But simple math tells you that adding $5000/yr likely won't cut it. That implies needing to accumulate an additional $350,000 on top of the $200k that we are assuming grows to $400k. 5000 per for 15 years is $75,000.
However, if the goal is to pay off a mortgage before retirement to spend would-be mortgage payments on other things during retirement, the math may not work out. For one, any savings from retiring home debt is a one-time savings (the interest expense).
That is difficult to pull off but if you do the math on that it shows long term outperformance. He makes a good point about not relying solely on math to assess markets and portfolio construction, that the psychology of markets is important too. 75/50 seeks to capture 75% of the upside with only 50% of the downside.
If you do the math, that yields a better long term result in nominal terms and also in risk adjusted terms. He popped up ten or so years later writing occasionally at the old Index Universe website which later became ETF.com. 75/50 targets 75% of the upside and 50% of the downside.
There's other math about outperformance but also the observation that momentum is prone to crashes. They said they were impressed by the backtest and the thought process underlying the strategy and shared this link to a short paper by Larry Swedroe posted on the Alpha Architect website.
I haven't seen too many scenarios where Roth conversions were optimal as most people don't earn more after they retire. Do the math on your particulars like what your various sources of earned income will likely be, how much your RMDs will likely be and so on. I'm paraphrasing Slott.
In the case of real estate a 2.29% weighting and for "private equity" companies it's about 17 basis points (looked at XLF holdings and then did a little math), that's just not going to move the needle. You may agree with Jack about not needing those things, that's valid, my point is that owning an index fund isn't a proxy for them.
The topics covered are personal finance math, retirement problems, introduction to mutual funds, the concept of fund & NAV, equity schemes, debt funds, investing in bonds, index funds, rolling returns, Exchange-traded funds(ETF) and basics of macroeconomics. You can enroll in the course here.
The way the math works, a 67% allocation to NTSX (Portfolio 2 with 33% in the T-bill ETF) equals 100% in Vanguard Balanced Index Fund (VBAIX) which is a proxy for 60/40 and Portfolio 3. It's not that leverage on its face must be bad but at the heart of many capital market calamities has been the misuse of leverage.
In terms of complexity, several of the funds blend together multiple complex strategies and the blend itself is complex in terms of the math applied and the outcomes sought, they are complex-complexity. I do not know if his life circumstance is such where a game over approach is appropriate.
As a financial advisor or other investment professional, you’re no doubt already well aware that the “math” side of the conversation is a large part of what your clients need help with every day. RetirementPlanning. Retirementplanning is a very precise process, and one that is unique to the individual.
Despite the leveraged semiconductor ETFs, when blended with USMV, the portfolio is underweight technology versus the S&P 500 using simple math, it works out to about 26% versus closer to 40% for the S&P 500. Consider the following two portfolios.
If it is going to happen, it won't be for ten years +/-, plenty of time to factor that into your math. There is simply no way that a cut in Social Security payouts should catch anyone off guard.
The math is only off by a shade using leverage via UST and a little bit of SSO, remember RPAR is leveraged. I find this to be interesting but anyone needing normal stock market growth in order for their retirementplan to work, probably isn't going to get it from any of these portfolios.
So using simple math, the total return is 34% versus 72% for the common. Based on an initial price for NVDY of $20, the $4.53 adds another 22.5% to the total return for anyone who bought when the fund first listed in May and just held on. We've talked some about covered calls lately.
Generally speaking, pensions are less viable than they used to be, the math doesn't work as well. About 40 years ago employers started to pivot away from pensions to 401k, they started to pivot away from defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans. So that's quite a bit to chew on even if it isn't a new idea.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content