This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
How bad at math do you need to be to think that it’s only 5 stocks driving this market? American household debt may be at record highs, but so too are Assets and Incomes + the ratio between debt + income is near record lows. Russell 2000 is the big laggard in 2023, and has been much of the year. Only 5 stocks driving markets?!
They run over $800 billion in client assets, and Kristen’s group, the North American Group, is responsible for about half of the revenue that that massive organization generates. I — I loved math, but really, I was going to go down that literature route more than anything else and — and study Spanish literature.
I’d say management consulting is any of the other thing that least at that time was the other career trajectory, just my personality, more of a math oriented introvert. Then what enables that you have to have some asset ability capability that competitors can’t equally duplicate. In 2000, right. So I was at Harvard.
1999, 2000, the internet was blowing up. The SNL crisis Tiger Chase had started, you know, in the wake of the internet melding down in 2000. I I was speaking at the Javits Center, 2000 people in the audience. If you think back to 2000, Amazon was the disruptor to Walmart or to Macy’s. And that was 25 years ago.
Notably, between 2000 and 2016, U.S.-based STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) funding is steadily declining—a dynamic that potentially opens the door for China to gain ground on the AI innovation front. It should not be assumed that investments in such securities or asset classes have been or will be profitable.
Notably, between 2000 and 2016, U.S.-based STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) funding is steadily declining—a dynamic that potentially opens the door for China to gain ground on the AI innovation front. It should not be assumed that investments in such securities or asset classes have been or will be profitable.
So, so you’ve held analyst roles and a number of asset managers. And so I had a lot of contacts in Australia at that point, and one of them was the CEO of what was at the time called Colonial First State Global Asset Management. We just don’t know which, once you start doing things online, that kind of changes.
So if you start with the S&P 500 or in this case stocks and bonds, you only have two asset classes, right. So the proper benchmark for those pools has to look a little bit like the underlying assets they’re investing in. If you look at the types of assets that Yale invests in, you can create a benchmark for each pool.
It’s possible to turn 10K into 100K, but assets need time to appreciate. Let’s look at one tried-and-true way of multiplying your assets: retirement accounts. Some quick math for the value of your $10,000 after a certain number of years: 10 years: $20,000. So keep that in mind: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
The transcript from this week’s, MiB: Mike Greene, Simplify Asset Management , is below. We have to pay attention to this, and we have to understand why this is potentially a risky asset. You can stream and download our full conversation, including any podcast extras, on Apple Podcasts , Spotify , YouTube , and Bloomberg.
Instead of investing in a productive asset, these speculators were just assuming the recent momentum would continue. It’s fun math – a 20% drop in prices means you get 25% more shares for your dollar, and a 50% drop means twice as many , or 100% more shares per dollar invested.). 2) My net worth has just cratered by 20%.
SETHI: Well, everybody thought they were a genius including me in 1999, 2000. I’ll tell you something funny and people you know, we never quite had that accusation, but for the better part of 15 years before I started accepting capital, it was, “Hey, everybody’s telling you how to manage your assets the wrong way.
She runs their private internal fund, about $108 billion that she manages primarily in fixed income, private credit, a variety of other assets. I took a lot of math classes. I couldn’t give up math in computer science. Here is the plan, here’s how you should go about in this deal or in, in this new asset class.
She is an author and former hedge fund trader, specializing in distressed assets. MIELLE: Well, I mean, it was a fairly new asset class. I think, you know, it’s not until probably Farallon came into existence, that it became a real asset class in itself, that stressed and distressed was a category that was thought as investable.
5% yields are an attractive alternative to risk assets, especially since it’s been close to 16 years since overnight rates were at current levels. Do the Math Let’s do the math. What better index than the Russell 3000, which includes the Russell 1000 big cap universe and the Russell 2000 small cap index.
You can go get some turnkey asset management program. We’re in the business of sitting in between asset owners, financial advisors, institutions, retail and asset managers, right, the BlackRock, State Street, PIMCO’s of the world, and helping them understand each other. That is a mug’s game, right?
ANAT ADMATI, PROFESSOR OF FIANCE AND ECONOMICS, STANFORD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: So, my journey starts where I took a lot of math. I was good in math and I love the math. So, I was kind of, in my romantic mind when I was in my early 20s, I was going to take but not give back to math, that kind of thing. ADMATI: OK.
But the numbers you can’t argue with, I mean, we all know that the brutal math of investing before costs investors collectively will earn the market return after costs. And suddenly you could buy index funds that cover all of the major asset classes. I did it in 2000, 2002. It’s, it’s a temporary move.
That period very much encompasses Vanguard going from an admittedly successful, but not enormous entity, till I think the 2000s, especially the financial crisis, changed how people thought about managed assets, indexing, advisory versus transactional, and Vanguard, along with BlackRock, have been two of the biggest beneficiaries of this.
As a matter of math, it cannot repeat the run from 8.5% In the 2000's, foreign outperformed and a large allocation to foreign was very important during that time. In past posts we've looked at labeling asset classes with more descriptive names as opposed to just the nouns that they are like stocks and bonds. in November.
BRYANT: So money, unlike math, money is highly emotional. I mean, there’s 50,000 kids in the Atlanta public school system, so you can do the math there. I believe I love math because it doesn’t have an opinion, that’s a Melody Hobson quote. RITHOLTZ: Right. RITHOLTZ: Right. RITHOLTZ: Yes.
I wouldn’t say I like one better than the other, but what I would say is I do find more personal satisfaction in helping the asset owner clients who really need the help. And then I developed this macro affinity starting in 2000, really? So that’s the math. So that, that’s the challenge. 2009, 10 in that role.
I want to get into that before we start talking about asset management. So I, I did a math degree at Oxford, which is more pure math. So I, I did a math degree at Oxford, which is more pure math. You know, pure math can be very theoretical and detached from the real world, and it’s getting worse.
KKR was the biggest with $400 million of assets and eight people. And Forstmann Little was the second biggest with $200 million of assets, and four professionals and they hired me in as the fifth professional. KLINSKY: That was a super hot theme in the year 1999 and 2000. Do you do distressed asset, real estate?
He’s crushed the Russell 2000, whatever benchmark you want to talk about. And I was a math nerd as a kid. You’re 34th, you’re retiring after 34 years and you trounce what’s really the more appropriate benchmark, I would assume the Russell 2000. And the assets under management were smaller.
Sander Gerber : Well, actually I was good at math. You’ve been managing outside capital across a variety of asset classes and strategies. Because if you don’t include every single data point, then in the matrix math you have a divide by zero issue. This blows up to a $13 trillion asset class.
And that’s, that’s the predecessor to Amherst, which we bought in 2000 and had been running it since then. So think about 2003 home prices had gone up a lot from 2000. So mortgage position in 2000 were way more valuable in 2003 than they were when they originated because they weigh less credit risk. Anything else?
She was CIO at Merrill Lynch Asset Management, and now CIO at both Morgan Stanley Wealth Management and runs their asset allocation models and their outsourced chief investment officer models. ’cause the asset management business of Sanford Bernstein, as everyone I think knows, was a deep value shop.
The math checks out and while the timing for these funds to launch was simply unlucky, I can't figure how these make managing a portfolio easier. Leveraging equity beta with more stock exposure was a mistake to learn from, leveraging into uncorrelated assets makes more sense, it should be safer. In 2022 it was only down 5.49%.
It’s not because they’re not good enough at math. was founded in 1926, acquired by Natixis in 2000, and manages over $335 billion in client assets. Trump enjoys unwavering devotion — and collects the staggering price of admission. ( Now the strategy is starting to bear fruit. Loomis Sayles & Co.
Now he’s the head of the discretion team at Loomis Sales, which manages well over $335 billion in client assets. I started out math and, and physics, and in high school I was a rock star in math and physics. The same phrase was during the financial crisis when people talked about toxic assets.
It’s about half our assets. ASNESS: About half our assets are really traditional, where money managers beat, you know, plenty of things, don’t let a short, or lever, or any of those hedge fund kind of things. My mom was a math teacher so — RITHOLTZ: Okay. RITHOLTZ: Okay. RITHOLTZ: Bill Sharpe. ASNESS: Same way.
So, I did the math, 20 million times a hundred. So, let me just repeat the math. And so, again, I went through this simple math. Asset management group had made an argument and then the investment bank says, he works here, and then the emerging market people say, what about us, and it was going on and on.
And I, and I really like the application of math and statistics and computer science to markets. We were talking about luck earlier, got introduced to a local asset manager outside of Boston who saw what I was working on and said, this is really interesting. I mean, that’s why it gathered so many assets.
Wasn’t the Excel spreadsheet error, which changed their math. I mean the, when consumers pull back, right, because the, the government surpluses are like, they work like a Hoover, they’re just vacuuming up net financial assets. And despite the Fed’s zero ERP policy that wildly stimulated asset prices.
Let me start managing assets. Yeah, you have to, you know, the conceit of finance is that basically the math is all there is to it. So you mentioned half math, half Shakespeare. Let’s talk about the math side. I wanna, I want to get into some of the details before we start talking about markets and investing.
RITHOLTZ: So wait, you’re, I’m trying to do the math, if you were 24 in ‘08, so you got this watch in 2000, 99? Cars are so much more expensive to maintain as a collectible asset, it’s remarkable. He gave me his Omega Speedmaster, which is a really nice watch. When I was 16 years old, it was my only nice watch.
I’d been ranked i i back in the seventies, if you can do the math. It’s not as, as strong as your business in the asset management business. Hustle was managing institutional right assets. And like you mentioned, the smooth sailing in the 2000 tens 00:15:07 [Speaker Changed] Didn’t feel that way at the time.
In 2000, I mean, sorry, in 1980, I was 15 years old, I’m sneaking into comedy clubs watching, you know, Jim Carrey and Dave Thomas and, you know, like everybody could show up on a night. I mean, a lot of the best trades that Cramer did as a hedge fund manager, you know, tapping out before everything went to hell in 2000.
Colin Camerer : So I, some of it was when I was in college at Johns Hopkins, I, I studied physics and math. And there was people, Physics didn’t have, people, psychology didn’t have math, economics was kind of the right mix. The math doesn’t math. That was too abstract. Yeah, I’m gonna vote.
So this is after March of 2000, his famous op-ed “Big-Cap Tech Stocks are a Sucker’s Bet.”. In every recession, except one and that was the tech bust of 2000, the drawdown of REITs was greater than the S&P 500. Then 25 years after that, in 2000, well, we all know dot-com burst and then bust. You have to apply.
That’s why the markets are much more of a mind game than a math game. And that’s why markets will always be exceedingly hard, even when the math seems easy or the future seems certain. On average, the median Wall Street forecast from 2000 through 2023 missed its target by an astonishing 13.8 Stop with the math.`
Which on the books, if all you’re thinking about is you’re in a cubicle and you’re analyzing numbers for some publicly traded company, you slash inventory, you’ve lowered, or I’m sorry, you’ve increased return on asset because inventory is asset, right? So asset is now smaller. I do the math.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content