This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It would take an extreme move up in rates to cause a big move in the price of a two year instrument, very extreme, but if that happened, the time needed to bail you out would be very short as opposed to be far underwater on an issue that matures in 2035 or 2040. The argument I've been making has been simpler.
Once you've allocated risk correctly, more of a top down process, I would encourage focusing on the bottom line number of the portfolio first. If you have bonds that mature in 2035 or 2040, maybe they haven't done what you would have hoped for but in terms of figuring out what to do, you're in a bad spot. That's how it works.
Yet another piece from Yahoo Finance about the jackpot that Gen-X is in when it comes to being able to retire. The article started with a rehash of the latest numbers we mentioned the other day that Gen-X on aggregate expects to be $439,000 short of what they think they need, $661,000 versus $1.1
This amplifies the medical costs that come with it and brings the need to factor in potential medical expenses in your financial plan, including insurance premiums, deductibles, and co-pays. The average national cost of individual health insurance for a 40-year-old in 2023 is $560, a 4% increase from 2022 for silver plans.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 36,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content