The High Cost of Brexit

Many Brits loathed the large intake of foreigners in the years leading up to the referendum in 2016 and saw Brexit as an opportunity to stop that. Little did they realise that Brexit wouldn’t change anything. Although EU net migration began to fall immediately after the referendum and eventually turned negative, non-EU net-migration has, in recent years, risen dramatically. In other words, more foreigners than ever arrive in the UK.

The biggest economic own goal I have ever seen

If seven of your ten largest trading partners are members of the same free trade organisation that you are a member of, does it make any (economic) sense to leave it? Well, what do you think? Before the Brexit referendum, the UK traded more with the Netherlands – a nation of less than 18 million people – than it did with China and its 1.4 billion people (Exhibit 3). To voluntarily leave such an arrangement will probably go down in history as the biggest economic own goal ever.

Prior to the Brexit referendum in June 2016, only 14% of total trade in the UK took place with countries that were not members of the EU and/or not covered by any EU/EEA trade agreements (Exhibit 4). Obviously, some of the trade with the EU has been maintained, but a meaningful proportion of it has been lost (source: House of Commons Library).

This has resulted in a massive loss of economic momentum. As you can see in Exhibit 5 below, many academic studies have been conducted in order to assess the economic damage. The studies do not agree on the extent of the damage – it ranges from -2% to -10% – but they all agree that the net impact has been far from positive. I should also point out that the 12 studies below weren’t conducted at the same time, which explains much of the variety in estimates.

In relative terms, as you can see in Exhibit 6, Brexit has also led to more difficult conditions. UK living standards are now well behind those of the EU and the US. And, as you can also see, the UK began to fall behind almost immediately after the referendum in 2016, making it hard to blame it on anything but Brexit.

Admittedly, the pandemic took a bigger toll on the UK economy than it did elsewhere, and the same is the case as far as the recent energy crisis is concerned. That said, the fact that the UK economy began to underperform immediately after the referendum makes it crystal clear that Brexit remains the root cause.

Why the UK will rejoin the EU eventually

Before I go any further, let me make it as clear as I possibly can. I am not a big fan of the EU. Its many shortcomings are a constant source of irritation. A key concern of mine is the right of veto, which is being blatantly abused from time to time – most recently by Viktor Orbán, the Hungarian Prime Minister. The EU leadership must find a way to weed out this and other sorts of malpractice before adding more countries. Despite my frustration, the economic advantages of being part of a free trade zone overshadow all those little nags, and the Brits will reach the same conclusion one day, I believe.

More recently, the British government has been busy blowing the trumpet after having landed ‘all those wonderful’ free trade agreements since leaving the EU. Let me share the truth with you. The UK has landed three free trade agreements since leaving the EU – one with Canada, another one with Australia and a third with New Zealand. The UK had a free trade agreement in place with all three countries when in the EU and, in every single case, the new agreement is a copy and paste of the existing EU agreement. In other words, the UK has achieved nothing they didn’t have before.

Do you really think the UK economy will benefit from deals identical to what they had before whilst giving up a very attractive deal with Germany and other European trading partners? I don’t think it takes an Einstein to answer that question.

In terms of the continued wave of immigrants, had the situation improved post Brexit, many Brits would probably have been prepared to accept some reduction in living standards, but it hasn’t. As you saw in Exhibit 2, the immigrants just come from other parts of the world now. The longer this wave of immigration lasts whilst living standards continue to decline – and they will – the more intense the popular pressure for another referendum.

Why will living standards continue to suffer? When you say farewell to free trade with 450 million people in your own backyard and enter a new regime where you at best can obtain the same terms you already had with the rest of the world, things can only go one way. Do I need to remind you that international trade is the source of most pockets of wealth around the world? Take a few of the wealthiest cities in Europe – Amsterdam, Antwerp, Barcelona, Copenhagen, Florence and Nice. Where do you think all their wealth comes from?

One last point to wrap it all up. Allow me to go back to Exhibit 1 for a moment. I argued that large amounts of immigration drove many Brits to vote for Brexit. I ought to tell you that the UK is nowhere near the top of the list of OECD countries with most foreigners. As you can see in Exhibit 7, Luxembourg is in a league of of its own which is explainable. Amongst the 5-6 largest European countries, the UK finds itself very much in the middle of the range.

After having lived in the UK for 35 years, I know one or two things about that country. And I don’t think immigration is the root cause behind the problem. It is just being used as an excuse – either consciously or subconsciously. No, the root cause is the North-South divide, as inequalities in the distribution of wealth has led to frictions.

Whilst understable, this is a slippery slope. London will become less and less attractive as a centre for international trade (remember what I said earlier about the importance of international trade for wealth creation). Consequently, the whole country will suffer. At some point, the masses will demand another referendum, and that will lead to a re-entry. The only problem (for the UK) is that it will take a new generation of political leaders to understand (and accept) this, i.e. nothing will happen the next 10-15 years.

Niels Clemen Jensen founded Absolute Return Partners in 2002 and is Chief Investment Officer. He has over 30 years of investment banking and investment management experience and is author of The Absolute Return Letter.

A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: To learn more about this and other topics, check out our full schedule of upcoming CE-approved virtual events.

© Absolute Return Partners

Read more commentaries by Absolute Return Partners