Home > Risk > Where do we sit? Its important!

Where do we sit? Its important!

This may be an odd question to ask, but as a leader of internal audit and risk management it was an important issue for me.

While there is so much talk about artificial intelligence, I believe it is far more important to optimize human intelligence!

Where we sit affects:

  • Our ability to know what is happening in the business.
  • The perception of us as being part of the business and not in an ivory tower.
  • Our understanding of the culture of the organization, including the morale of the people.
  • Our ability to have confidential discussions among ourselves and with management – without being overheard.
  • People’s ability to visit us without others knowing.
  • Ready access to management and staff.
  • Our access to files and other information.
  • In an odd way, our agility. We don’t have to travel to perform the audit or to meet with people – and meeting with people face-to-face is far superior to a virtual meeting. We can stop by to talk to (or, better, listen to) people without having to schedule a call or meeting.

I liked to embed auditors in the business. If they are local, even in the same trading room for example, they are seen and accessible. They get to know the people leading and performing the business. They are known to them as humans, not just practitioners. You tend to trust people you know, but not so much people from Corporate.

But at the same time, you need to be able to have confidential discussions without being overheard. You need to be able to say or hear things, even use language in private that you would not repeat to management.

It’s also important for the head of the department to have easy access to and by management, as well as to staff. The same goes for managers within the department.

I have run into problems with this in the past, including:

  • At one organization, the CFO wanted me to stop hiring employees in the US or even in Singapore. He felt I could outsource staffing to India at lower cost. But we had no operations in India, so this made no sense other than as a way of cutting cost (which was debatable).
  • At another where I was interviewing for a CAE position, I would have needed to make an appointment to see any of the C-level executives because they were in a separate, locked, part of the building. I did not accept their offer.
  • One company barred me from using the executive coffee room. I liked to go there, less for their coffee (which was admittedly made using an expensive machine) and more to bump into C-level executives. In fact, that was the first place I was able to have a friendly conversation with the COO.

We need to pay attention to our human intelligence in many ways (including employee training, our perception and reputation, and far more).

One often overlooked factor is where we sit.

Are you and the other practitioners in your organization sitting in the best places?

I welcome your thoughts.

  1. Anonymous
    March 22, 2024 at 12:25 PM

    The perfect piece. I had a similar experience and I completely agree with the thoughts above.

    One of my experiences is that as soon as an auditor starts working directly in an open space (as permanent workplace) among, for example, financial service personnel, at first, everyone around him is quite suspicious and cautious of this. Work and non-work issues are now discussed less openly and loudly. But upon a little time, everyone treats the auditor like one of their own. And over some more time, seeing and hearing how the auditor works and behaves, they begin to trust him more and more and more and more contact him with their questions or problems. After a while, the auditor, simply being in a common room without additional effort, naturally knows a lot about how really the company lives. Such knowledge is invaluable for auditor.

    • Norman Marks
      March 22, 2024 at 12:31 PM

      Thanks for sharing

      • March 24, 2024 at 4:07 AM

        To gain the confidence of personnel takes time, probably a week or more. The downside of ‘agile’ auditing is that it may not allow that confidence to develop.

  2. Anonymous
    March 22, 2024 at 4:51 PM

    I’d like to see some sort of independent commentary in a ‘Transparency Report’ from governance-related business functions (not just Internal Audit) embedded within an organisation’s Annual Report. The intent would be for commentators (including CAEs) to reflect on the existing strengths and weaknesses of existing governance arrangements, including how they plan to improve or influence the current state over the next 12 months.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.