Existing Home Sales Decline 9th Month, Down Another 5.9 Percent

Existing home sales from the National Association of Realtors via St. Louis Fed

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) reports Existing-Home Sales Slumped 5.9% in October

Existing Home Sales Key Points 

  • Existing-home sales faded for the ninth month in a row to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.43 million. Sales fell 5.9% from September and 28.4% from one year ago.
  • Total housing inventory registered at the end of October was 1.22 million units, which was down 0.8% from both September and one year ago (1.23 million). Unsold inventory sits at a 3.3-month supply at the current sales pace, up from 3.1 months in September and 2.4 months in October 2021.
  • The median existing-home price for all housing types in October was $379,100, a gain of 6.6% from October 2021 ($355,700), as prices rose in all regions. This marks 128 consecutive months of year-over-year increases, the longest-running streak on record.
  • Properties typically remained on the market for 21 days in October, up from 19 days in September and 18 days in October 2021. Sixty-four percent of homes sold in October 2022 were on the market for less than a month.
  • “In October, 24% of homes received over the asking price. Conversely, homes sitting on the market for more than 120 days saw prices reduced by an average of 15.8%,” according to Lawrence Yun, the NAR chief economist.
  • First-time buyers were responsible for 28% of sales in October, down from 29% in both September 2022 and October 2021. NAR’s 2022 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers – released earlier this month – found that the annual share of first-time buyers was 26%, the lowest since NAR began tracking the data.

Existing-Home Sales Month-Over-Month

The last month-over-month increase in existing home sales was January. For nine months sales have declined.

Existing-Home Sales Supply

Supply of homes for sales declined in October but at the current rate of sales, the month’s supply rose. 

Month’s supply at the current rate of sales has risen 8 of the last nine months and the other was flat.

Existing Home Sales Crash

  • Existing home sales are down 28.4% from one year ago.
  • Existing home sales are down 31.7% since January.

That’s a crash. And never have we seen such declines other than in recessions. 

Buyers and Sellers Strike 

The annual share of first-time buyers was 26%, the lowest in NAR tracking history. 

Buyers are on strike because they cannot afford the combination of price and mortgage rates. 

Sellers are also on strike. They hope to get prices they could have received a year ago.

NAR Cheerleading

30-year mortgage chart from Mortgage News Daily, annotations by Mish.

NAR cheerleader Lawrence Yun made this amusing statement: “Mortgage rates have come down since peaking in mid-November, so home sales may be close to reaching the bottom in the current housing cycle,” Yun said.

Buyers went on strike in February with the average 30-year mortgage rate at 3.7 percent. The average rate is now 6.65 percent down from a peak 7.37 percent. 

Is 6.65 percent really going to lead to a buyer’s splurge heading into if not in recession?

Housing Starts and Permits Swing to More New Lows For This Cycle

Seasonally-adjusted, annualized (SAAR) housing starts from commerce department, chart by Mish

Meanwhile, please note Housing Starts and Permits Swing to More New Lows For This Cycle

And it is single family units, not apartments that are leading the decline. Homes are not affordable. 

US Treasury Yield Curve Is One of the Most Inverted in History

Also note the US Treasury Yield Curve Is One of the Most Inverted in History

This is a strong recession signal.

The Fed actively seeks to pop the housing bubble that it created. Given policy acts with a lag, the Fed is likely to overshoot with a policy error in the opposite direction.

Is this anyway to run a country or a business?

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
great analysis. thanks.
BDR45
BDR45
1 year ago
SFRs go contingent in 12 to24 hours here in N. Florida. I’ve made three above listing offers and barely get a response. Maybe we are living in an alternative universe, where real estate ONLY goes up in price.
Mish
Mish
1 year ago
Been very busy editing pictures almost caught up.
Some spectacular Autumn images but here is one I just finished from August.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
Spectacular Mish.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
gorgeous. lived in AZ and CA for 2 decades. miss the landscapes………and big sky
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Granted, it’s lagging two months, but the Case-Schiller index for August was still up 13.1% YoY. Get back with me in January and let’s see what the CS index says then. I’ll perk up and pay attention when it gets to a 15% YoY decline.
My house doubled in value in 4 years. There are houses in the US that doubled in three years. We’ve got at least 9 months before it gets interesting. And as I always say, none of the price declines matter one bit if Uncle Sam swoops in with rent & mortgage relief when the going gets tough.
Modern Monetary Theory at it’s finest.
JeffD
JeffD
1 year ago
Missing from the article: All-cash sales accounted for 26% of transactions in October, up from 22% in September and 24% in October 2021. This is significant.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  JeffD
Who pays all-cash at the top of the market but the money launderers? Any other guesses?
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
Reply to  JeffD
26% is and is not significant. Was the percentage increase due to more cash buyers or fewer buyers paying with mortgages? Probably fewer buyers paying with mortgages. Were cash buyers investors? Then the percent of cash buyers would be significant because it would mean investors are still optimistic their investment will generate enough cash flow. A really good metric to report is the number of homes bought for investment rather than owner occupied.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
NDX closed < May 12/17 trading range, two black candles this week. The weekly, a red doji, under Oct 25 high.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
Banks aren’t intermediaries. They should be Nationalized. The FED is driving in reverse.
This isn’t like the deflationary GFC. This bust is stagflationary. Home prices will quickly rebound.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
You are ignoring the coming credit losses in 2023.
There will be no stagflation.
The worry will be keeping the bow above water (deflation).
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
As the deceleration in the rate-of-change in long-term money flows abruptly ends in June 2023, prices will then rebound.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
The banks should have been nationalized in 2009 when the rats were abandoning the sinking ship.
Since then, they have received TBTF protection and have become even bigger.
They are nothing but government guaranteed utilities milking the society for profit.
However, you will sooner find intelligent life on Earth than see nationalized banks in the USA or the West.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
There’s a conflict of interest between the FED and the Treasury. There’s also a conflict of interest between the banks and the FED. Nationalization would be like direct purchases. MMT and CBDC’s seem like a way for politicians to side-step this conflict. That won’t work either.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Another sector of housing market that will retrench (layoff):

Independent mortgage banks (IMBs) and mortgage subsidiaries of chartered banks reported a net loss of $624 on each loan they originated in the third quarter of 2022, down from a reported loss of $82 per loan in the second quarter of 2022, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) newly released Quarterly Mortgage Bankers Performance Report.

“The average pre-tax net production income per loan reached its lowest level since the inception of MBA’s report in 2008, which is sobering news given that the third quarter is historically the strongest quarter of the year,” said Marina Walsh, CMB, MBA’s Vice President of Industry Analysis. “The industry continues to struggle with a perfect storm of lower production volume and revenues and escalating production costs, which for the first time exceed $11,000 per loan.”

Added Walsh, “Companies are responding to tough market conditions by reducing excess capacity, including staff. The number of production employees per firm is down 7 percent from the previous quarter and 19 percent from one year ago. However, overall volume has dropped so swiftly that some companies are having difficulties adjusting staffing and other costs to match market conditions.”

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
I bought my first house before I got married. Until then I’d made do with college crap furniture. I always vowed to get new stuff when I got a house. I asked around to find THE place to go. Took my Mom with me to get everything in 1 shot. She: Not possible. Me: I did. Around 20 pieces.
On the other end of every no sale is a factory cutting back / idling (workers).
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Mish,
your thoughts on 7% fed rate?
“St. Louis Federal Reserve President James Bullard suggested on Thursday that the central bank might have to raise short-term interest rates as high as 7% to ensure that inflation goes away.”
I may kiss my property rental ambitions goodbye and just buy Treasurys. I’ll take 7% bonds for 10 or 20 years.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
“I’ll take 7% bonds for 10 or 20 years.”
Bonds have spoken. Something other than inflation on deck for 2023.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
“I’ll take 7% bonds for 10 or 20 years.”
I’d guess the yield curve would be very inverse with Fed funds at 7% so I doubt you’d get that rate for 10 to 20 years. Not unless inflation soars from current levels that is.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
No, just no. It would take the Fed all the way through 2023 to hit a 7% FFR. And, the Fed can’t raise rates that high due to our national debt. To do so would protract out the reasonable time period the Fed has to have the FFR at or above 4% past mid 2024. There’s $3.665T bills that will roll over within a year. There’s $13.727T in notes that most of which matures in three years. Federal tax receipts peaked in Q3 or Q4 FY 2022. As revenues drop next year & interest expense climbs upwards of $850B in FY 2023, the Fed will be forced to end QT by June 2023. Now, 5% is guaranteed, but at that point they’ll be forced to pause, especially as England on other major economies continue to raise rates and drain liquidity through QT.
I don’t see 7%. This isn’t the early 80’s when Volcker didn’t have massive government debt of today and an $8.7T Fed balance sheet. The 10, 20 & 30Y treasuries may see one more rally and then peak by early next year. The 3Y and under treasuries will continue to climb, creating an even wider yield curve inversion.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Don’t forget the National Debt is devaluing with 4% rates and 7% plus inflation. So the $13.727T in notes maturing within 3 years will be worth a lot less. The government is borrowing at negative real rates, they’ve got plenty of room to raise them a bit more. If inflation declines they can cut them to retain the cheap real cost of funds.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  Scooot
“Don’t forget the National Debt is devaluing with 4% rates and 7% plus inflation.”
I’m not even sure I know what that means. The point is that, if the Fed is forced to keep the FFR above 4% for a significant amount of time (let’s say 2 more years), there’s trillions of debt that’s going to roll over at 3-5x+ the interest rate that it was issued at. With falling tax receipts and rising interest on the debt, this could be a very big deal once we start FY 2024. We’re guaranteed to run at least $1.2T annual deficits for the foreseeable future. By the end of FY 2024, annual deficits of $2T could become the norm. At that point, the national debt jumps towards $40T very quickly. I just don’t think most people respect how out of control this all could get around the time Biden wraps up his disastrous only term.
With Title 42 ended, we’ll see about 10M illegal immigrants come into the US by the time DeSantis takes office. This is going to cause significant upward pressures on rent, food prices & fuel consumption. It’s going to be a game changer, and no one wants to talk about it due to the political correctness / woke agenda running rampant. Last Medicare Part A (hospitals) goes broke in 2026. Part B (Drs) ran a $500B deficit last year and will only get worse. The SSTF will run out by 2032, possibly as early as 2030. This means higher SS taxes as the population ages and is supported by fewer workers. Financial Armageddon is no more than 8 years off. In that time, China’s economy may also push past ours.
None of this is hyperbole.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
No worries. The only point I was trying to make is that whilst the interest cost of the debt is less than the inflation rate, the real value of the debt falls without actually making any repayments.
For example one trillion of debt would grow to 1.48 trillion in 10 years time at a compound 4% interest rate. However in todays dollars, that 1.48 trillion is only worth about 0.75 trillion at a constant 7% inflation. Therefore in todays dollars the debt in 10 years time is worth less than it was at the beginning, despite interest costs and no repayments being made.
Of course all you say about falling tax receipts etc and the affect on the nominal value of the debt is correct.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  Scooot
Got it. But, I don’t see how the value of the debt is really all that important. As it grows ever higher with inflation being persistent high (i.e., PCE at or above 3%) for several more years, then what matters is the cost of that debt. That’s real money that has to be spent first before almost anything else. Also, I doubt there will be that big of a gap between PCE inflation and treasuries in about 12 months. Inflation is on the way down, al beit slowly. Personally, I think the Fed will continue to move its target PCE rate higher to at least 3% by the end of next year.
My biggest concern is housing. It’s enormously out of whack and needs to drop at least 30%. My opinion is once housing dips 10% nationally that we may find ourselves at 5% 30FYFRM which will allow housing to stabilize somewhat without meaningful price declines. We’ve got three story new town houses in my area, Woodstock GA, that are going for almost $900K which is utterly insane. This was posted yesterday about a $1M home San Antonio that blows these houses in my are out of the water.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
“But, I don’t see how the value of the debt is really all that important.”
As you say, when heading into into a slowdown or recession wages and tax revenues etc are under pressure and therefore so are public finances. However eventually wages will rise with inflation, and the government hopes they’ll catch up and some more. If so their debt is devalued (40T might be the same as say 10t today) and the general population are all earning more to pay the higher prices. However, savers and creditors that haven’t managed to protect themselves from the price rises are wiped out. This is generally what happens over a long time but at the moment it’s happening quickly and is very noticeable and painful to consumers. Hence the Fed’s effort to bring inflation down and get It under control. The main point however is once inflation is in a controlled ranged, if interest rates are less than inflation, the government have effectively got free finance. I’d be surprised if PCE falls much below treasuries, because treasuries would rally as soon as that seemed likely, unless the Fed starts buying them again. I don’t think QE is likely for years now because they’d be too worried the low yields would set off inflation again.
I didn’t watch all the video but that looked a lot of house for $1m. It’s usually unemployment, repossessions and forced sellers that cause housing prices to crash. Unemployment seems to be holding up at the moment but I must admit I’d be surprised if some sort of price correction didn’t happen in the not too distant future.
Scooot
Scooot
1 year ago
Reply to  Scooot
“unless the Fed starts buying them again.” Scrap this bit, it’s gobbledygook.
Should have said:
On the other hand “I don’t think QE is likely for years now because they’d be too worried the low yields would set off inflation again.”
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Scooot
Scooot, the problem is we have to regularly pay interest in dollars and not something called “value” whatever that may be. The Government is not selling highly “valued” assets to get the cash dollars they need to pay interest.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
It’s Déjà Vu all over again. A retro article from 2007.
and it took a very long time for housing to bottom. People are acting like housing will bottom next year and we’ll be off to the races again. Sorry. NOT. GONNA. HAPPEN.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
Keep in mind the ’08 crisis was sub-prime fueled, banks gave anyone with a pulse a mortgage solely to sell them to the market as “AAA” assets, which compounded the problem.
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
The Fed’s first rate increase of 25 basis points did not ever occur until Mid March 2022. Sales were sputtering even before Fed rate increases.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
Yes. Negative real earnings (weekly year over year) arrived April 2021. Recession in the cards no matter Federal Reserve policy.
Those who think a recession avoided by stopping rate hikes (and letting inflation run hot) are clueless (Senator Elizabeth Warren) of the Supply / Demand curve.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.