Ahead of Recession, California Faces a $25 Billion Budget Problem With Ongoing Deficits

Please consider California’s Fiscal Outlook for 2023-2024.

Executive Summary

  • Economic Conditions Weigh on Revenues. Facing rising inflation, the Federal Reserve— tasked with maintaining stable price growth—repeatedly has enacted large interest rate increases throughout 2022 with the aim of cooling the economy and, in turn, slowing inflation. 
  • State Faces $25 Billion Budget Problem and Ongoing Deficits. Under our outlook, the Legislature would face a budget problem of $25 billion in 2023-24. (A budget problem—also called a deficit—occurs when resources for the upcoming fiscal year are insufficient to cover the costs of currently authorized services.) The budget problem is mainly attributable to lower revenue estimates, which are lower than budget act projections from 2021-22 through 2023-24 by $41 billion.
  • Save Reserves for a Recession. The $25 billion budget problem in 2023-24 is roughly equivalent to the amount of general-purpose reserves that the Legislature could have available to allocate to General Fund programs ($23 billion). While our lower revenue estimates incorporate the risk of a recession, they do not reflect a recession scenario

The Budget Problem

Lower revenues are expected to lead to a deficit of $25 billion in the budget window. Over the subsequent years of the forecast, annual deficits decline from $17 billion to $8 billion.  

However, those estimates do not reflect a recession scenario. 

Politicians and the Fed have a 100% track record of never predicting recession until it’s obvious to everyone we are in one. 

LOA Revenue Outlook

Image from California’s Fiscal Outlook, annotations by Mish

The exact path is unpredictable but the direction isn’t. Budget forecasts heading into recession are always overly rosy. 

I suspect the plunge will be steeper and faster than the state expects. 

The state makes “assumptions about how the economy is likely to perform over the coming 20 months and then using those assumptions to project revenue collections.” 

In this case, the state even admits that its budget “does not reflect a recession scenario.” 

Minimum Budget Guarantees

Proposition 98 establishes a “Budget Within a Budget” adjusted for inflation.

A shortfall in the context of the Proposition 98 budget means that funding under the guarantee is insufficient to cover the costs of existing educational programs, as adjusted by changes in student attendance and inflation.

The minimum funding requirement grows by an average of $5.6 billion (4.9 percent) per year over the next four years.

California Heads for a Budget Crunch

The Wall Street Journal provides additional color commentary in California Heads for a Budget Crunch

California’s steeply progressive income tax makes it heavily dependent on the income, and especially the capital gains, of high earners. The top 0.5% of taxpayers pay 40% of state income tax. Tax revenue surged in the pandemic as the Federal Reserve’s loose monetary policies inflated asset values. Many tech workers cashed out stock options.

Surging capital gains and a gusher of federal pandemic relief contributed to a $97 billion budget surplus in this fiscal year and $76 billion a year earlier. As usual, Democrats spent like this would never end. But stock values, especially of high-flying tech companies, have crashed since the Fed began tightening more aggressively this year. Silicon Valley companies are laying off workers.

Don’t Call It a Bribe

Starting in October, about 23 million Californians making less than $250,000 per year will receive a stimulus check ranging from $200 to $1,050, depending on income and the number of dependents. 

The program is expected to cost $10 billion. Yeah, let’s give away free money to people making up to $250,000 a year. That will sure cure inflation.

The WSJ made a sarcastic comment, “don’t call it a bribe.”

Reflections on Fair Share

Progressives will not be happy with the fact that the top 0.5% of taxpayers only pay 40% of state income tax. For them, “fair share” will be somewhere between 70% and 90%. 

Higher taxes will lead to more human and business flight. Good luck with that Governor Gavin Newsom.

Governor Newsom is unofficially running for president in 2024. It will be official the day president Joe Biden announces he will not run for reelection.

Had Democrats retained the House, free money bailouts to California, Illinois, New York, and New Jersey would have been massive.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

60 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Billy
Billy
1 year ago

“Don’t Call It a Bribe

Starting in October, about 23 million Californians making less than $250,000 per year will receive a stimulus check ranging from $200 to $1,050, depending on income and the number of dependents.”

I call it wealth redistribution. I also call it the reason why we are having a bear market rally.
Jackula
Jackula
1 year ago
A nice $100 billion deficit next year might sink Gavin’s presidential aspirations
Agave
Agave
1 year ago
I love California. The magnificent and varied landscapes and recreational paradises, the smart, creative, and forward looking people, the opportunities, the culture, the climate, the multi-cultural diversity, the open mindedness, the economic dynamism, the live and let live freedoms.
After about 40 years here, and having lived all over the country before that and traveling widely around the world since, there’s no place I’d rather call home. Just spent a few weeks in Hawaii, always enjoy that, but it’s great to be back home again.
The pile-on comments by flatlanders just make me chuckle as they repeat various contrived rubrics generated from afar. You could have the following dystopia instead, heh heh (At the hartmannreport dot com – If You Want To Die Young – Take the Red Pill – As giddy as Republicans are about “owning the libs,” the citizens they govern pay a tragic price for the sport)
lamlawindy
lamlawindy
1 year ago
Reply to  Agave
The landscape & climate are indeed gorgeous. The high taxes, whacky social policies, and animosity toward the right to keep & bear arms would make living there impossible for me.
abombthecoder
abombthecoder
1 year ago
Reply to  lamlawindy
I live in florida. we have significantly higher murder rate than california. more guns equal more easy murder. i want some state to ban guns, and I’ll live there. more guns, = more murder.
lamlawindy
lamlawindy
1 year ago
Reply to  abombthecoder
FL’s homicide rate is 7.8 per 1000. CA’s is 6.1 per 1000. That’s not exactly a huge difference. Plus, Utah (2.9 per 1000) and Idaho (2.5 per 1000) have relatively relaxed gun laws but have homicide rates WAY lower than either CA or FL.
Billy
Billy
1 year ago
Reply to  abombthecoder
You should live in Mexico. Guns are illegal there.
pimaCanyon
pimaCanyon
1 year ago
couldn’t happen to a nicer state. Or a nicer governor.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  pimaCanyon
Absolutely! I hope it grows to $50B the following year and keeps going up.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
I have to remember this if I am ever overdrawn at the bank – it’s simply a “budget problem.”
As they say: “deficits don’t matter.”
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
Unfortunately for you and the rest of us, we don’t have our own federal reserve or statutory authority to raise our debt limit every few years.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
1 year ago
That’s odd, I have heard for years from Barry Ritholtz and others that California’ Hugh budget surpluses prove they had the correct ideas and would lead the rest of the country to nirvana.
Coincidentally not an hour ago on the radio Washington State was proclaiming a huge budget surplus and at least some politicians were hoping for cut in the sales tax.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
The number of homeless in the US is estimated at ‘552,830’ (Sept 2022). That’s a White House number, hence the accuracy.
Apparently, ‘Fried’ gave $40 million to politicians in 2022, that’s enough to feed the nation’s homeless for a week or more. The total amount lost by Fried could be as much as $16 billion. That’s nearly $29,000 per homeless person. Fried could’ve been a national hero.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
They’ll do what every government does. They’ll sell bonds and push the debt problems into the future.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
They better do it quickly. Fed rate + California risk premium will likely be 7-8% 🙂
WarpartySerf
WarpartySerf
1 year ago
Nothing like ruining the most important state in the union in pursuit of absolute woke stupidity ….. I guess those are qualification for Newsom to move on and try to destroy the entire USA . Experience counts the most in politics .
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
“Now what?”
Home invasions…. Car jackings in Beverly Hills…. People no longer wearing watches, for fear of having their forearm chopped off…… What else is new in dystopia?
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
The other night, a man was returning home, to his residence in an upscale building, driving a Rolls Royce. He was robbed and shot as he arrived home.
At the other end of the spectrum, a homelss man was shot to death in Hollywood last night.
conservativeprof
conservativeprof
1 year ago
CA never had a surplus because of pension liabilities. The volatility in the stock and bond markets will cause pension liabilities to explode. CA has two government workforces, the current workers and retirees. Pension benefits are worth millions to middle and high end retirees. Many retirees are moving out of state to avoid CA income tax on their benefits. Pension agencies are likely to suffer even more staggering losses than typical investors because pension agencies are investing heavily in private assets. In addition, pension agencies have an arrogance about performance. Pension agencies keep agencies do not segregate sufficient safe assets for current retirees. Instead, pension agencies keep assets invested in risky assets, providing high returns in good times but crashing losses in bad times. Bad times are coming in Democrat run CA.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
Having a gridlocked Congress the next two years is a sigh of relief when considering Pelosi would have delighted to bail out CA, NY, NJ, and IL.
PreCambrian
PreCambrian
1 year ago
I got one of the $1050 checks (actually a transfer to my bank account). I thought that it was a stupid idea. It would have been better to either have a budget surplus to use in a bad year or start to cut the highest marginal tax rates. The highest income earners will move out (and obviously that isn’t me since I got a check). I didn’t really need a check, I am doing without it. California either needs a reasonably fiscal conservative Democrat or a socially liberal Republican as a governor. It helps control the spending.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  PreCambrian
“…a budget surplus to use in a bad year”
But, but, but … that sounds so awfully Keynesian.
Freebees2me
Freebees2me
1 year ago
Poll:
I am happy to pay higher federal income taxes to bail out California.
  • YES
  • NO
  • How stupid do you think I am?
Vote…
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  Freebees2me
How about we just stop giving CA federal assistance all togther?
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
If you think Cali has a budget problem, take a look at Kentucky with a debt to GDP of over 24% to Cali’s 17%.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
… also a net recipient of federal taxes, and a place where cousins can be cousins.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
President Newsom and his hollywood wife will save us from depression.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
President Newsom’s hairdo will singlehandedly fend off the lizard people armadas that are even now marshaling behind the moon….
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Wrong, wrong, wrong.
The lizard people are subterranean terrestrials.
Extraterrestrial aliens are forming the invasion armada on the dark side of Earth’s moon.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Don’t Call It a Bribe” “The program is expected to cost $10 billion.”
It was supposed to be the alternative to cutting the state gasoline tax. Maybe the state government will try to pay for it by a windfall tax on the oil companies. So far, all bark and no bite, on that idea.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
1 year ago
The eventual solution to too much liberalism is too much liberalism.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
The dose makes the poison.
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Newsom is fixated on “solving” the homeless problem by seemingly giving every homeless person a monthly stipend and a home of their own at low to no cost.
He recently pulled back $1 billion on promised spending for homelessness because action wasn’t occurring to fix the problem fast enough (before the money runs out?), which of course caused all the remoras to have a conniption!
I think Newson is hoping to use “solving” the homeless problem as his main talking point should he run for president.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
Last week i was in Hollywood and drove up Cahuenga, which passes under the Hollywood Freeway. Both sidewalks under the bridge, were lined with makeshift tents.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
That’s about all you can do for ’em. They have literally no value in our civilization, and I can’t imagine one they would have value in. They used to call it a mental institution, but those became pay only… and I don’t think they work all that well anyway. Better than having them stagger around on the sidewalk.
Friends of Jesus, what would he have us do about them?
Rbm
Rbm
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
There is only so much you can do to solve homelessness. Guess what needs to be discussed is where is that line. Also the more you try to solve the bigger the problem becomes.
Where are all the churches. Isnt this what they are supposed to address.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Rbm
Busted! No feel-good headlines from helping homeless citizens. Churches prefer to embed themselves in the border crisis
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Rbm
Churches do a lot of good. Including helping the homeless. They can’t solve all societal problems. Churches aren’t the problem.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
How much will homelessness increase when the country is in recession? Based on the 2007-9 increase of unsheltered homeless (living on the street, in a car, or abandoned building), the number could rise by as much as 40% in some states.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
My daughter’s job just went poof, so she will be moving back home in January. There is one more for your statistic, and she won’t show up on the official stats.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
And how many of those ~4M illegal aliens will be able to afford rent? And with Title 42 ending, I’ve read where daily border crossing may surge to 18K a day or 6.57M annually. People, that’s almost twice as many baby boomers retiring each day. That’s insane!
Dean_70
Dean_70
1 year ago
Idiots in CA keep vote to increase spending. I’m in CA and have never voted yes on anything that increases spending. I figured the government has the money but simply cannot manage it so why give them more to mismanage. Just a bunch of typical government employees running the state.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Dean_70
Yet the state’s infrastructure is crumbling.
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
Reply to  Dean_70
Maybe California isn’t for you. We have 49 other states to choose from! In tenessee, you can even get a license plate that identifies you as a godless heathen, if that’s what you’re into! The USA is your oyster!
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
In the 70’s, after Nixon opened China, globalization and high tech employees benefited, but the mid west was comatose. it cost $80K/y to
teach stem students in MIT, Stanford and CMU, but in Ukraine, Russia, China and N.Korea it cost almost nothing. Cyber experts built a bridge to extract wealth from the rich to transfer funds to the poor. The world benefit from cyber globalization in the long run. N.Korea cyber grad built a cyber bridge to extract from Sam Beckham Fried. They informed other players about a big hole in his ledger. The selling started. A whole generation of Gen Z and millennial community were devastated. CA programmers might join Johnstown, Braddock and Youngstown OH. Our gov will build a wall to protect Intel fab in OH
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
Are you saying that the Norks brough SBF low? Where’s your evidence?
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I said that the top secret, the invisible, NK cyber grad school project was to extract Beckham billions and informed other players about a hole in his ledger they themselves created. The selling started. NK 5:0 Beckham. How could that suddenly have happened : our programmers are below par. It takes time to realize it, but our institutions, businesses and gov are under attack and it’s happening almost every day, every year, for a many years For fun and entertainment only.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
Ah. Much clearer now. LOL
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
You might want to look at DARPA statements over the last few years about crypto fallability. Warning bells were rung, loud and clear.
But wait, the warnings came from DARPA, so ignored.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
What could possibly go wrong with spending national currencies on magic pseudo-random numbers?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
“… Cyber experts built a bridge to extract wealth from the rich to transfer funds to the poor….”
This is sarcasm, right?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
SBF is Samuel Bankman-Fried, not to be confused with the soccer player.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  8dots
8dots – “poor” is comparative descriptor, not a noun, right?
Zardoz
Zardoz
1 year ago
In SF, the area between Civic Center and the Mission already needs to be scraped and rebuilt. It’s apocalyptic… like a zombie movie. With the CRE vacancies, that rot is going to spread up market street. Elon’s slave ship building will be the only light.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Those Twitter layoffs sent a big signal to the rest of high tech to take a hard look at their own overstaffing. Sillycon Valley hasn’t seen a downturn for 20 years; lots of wretched excess has built up. A whole lot of people are going to realize, or be made to realize, that they add no economic value. As for S.F., yep, if this is how they run their city at the top, hoo boy just wait. Same for L.A.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Isn’t this what happens with vast amounts of faux debt– yield/required rate of return approaches zero? Risk is miss-priced and sub-optimal investments proliferate.
And these are the low-hanging fruit. Wait until GE, Ford, Citicorp, Intel….. start laying off.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Zardoz
You have a problem with reverse gentrification?
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
$25B is 12.8% of California’s state tax revs of $195B in FY22, which ended on June 30. That’s a big hole, and it’s going to get deeper as the state’s twin revenue pillars — Hollywood and Silicon Valley (including their finance stubs on Sand Hill Rd. and in San Francisco) — contract at the same time. But take heart! If you’re a trans, S.F. will pay you $1,200/month out of city funds because you are special. LOL
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I think I quoted incorrect numbers. California’s FY22 revs were just shy of $230B, so a $25B hole is just shy of 11%. The correct link for fiscal years is July at the link.
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
News flash – SF & state of CA are two completely different entities. Make comparisons that are apples to apples.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.