As Case-Shiller Home Prices Decline, The Fed Finally Admits a Housing Bubble

Case-Shiller home price data via St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

Home Price Synopsis

  • Home prices have peaked this cycle but the decline is certainly tiny compared to the run up.
  • Case-Shiller data lags. The latest data is from September and that represents sales primarily made in July and August so the declines shown are undoubtedly understated.
  • Prices are falling now across the board. There is a decline in every major metro area.
  • Declines will accelerate but not fast enough to revive a housing market that has soured dramatically.

CS National ,Top 10 Metro, CPI, OER

Case-Shiller home price data, OER, and CPI data via St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

Home Price Disconnect Notes

  • National is the Case-Shiller national home price index.
  • 10-City represents the weighted average of the cities in the first chart.
  • CPI is the Consumer Price Index
  • OER stands for Owner’s Equivalent Rent. It is the single largest component in the CPI with a current weight of 23.65% of the total CPI.
  • Rent of Primary Residence is a CPI component with a weight of 7.25% of the CPI.

OER is the price the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) says one would pay to rent one’s own house from oneself, unfurnished, without utilities.

Existing Home Sales

Existing home sales from the National Association of Realtors via St. Louis Fed

Existing Home Sales Month-Over-Month

Existing Home Sales Decline 9th Month, Down Another 5.9 Percent

On November 18, I noted Existing home sales from the National Association of Realtors via St. Louis Fed

Existing Home Sales Transaction Crash

  • Existing home sales are down 28.4% from one year ago.
  • Existing home sales are down 31.7% since January.

That’s a transaction crash. And never have we seen such declines other than in recessions. 

Prices have just started to decline. 

Powell Pawns Off the Blame 

Yesterday, Jerome Powell gave a speech at the Brookings Institute.

The Q&A then ended on an interesting housing question and Powell’s answer.

“Coming out of the pandemic, rates were very low, people wanted to buy houses, they wanted to get out of the cities and buy houses in the suburbs because of Covid. And so you really had a housing bubble, … very unsustainable levels and overheating. Now the housing market is going through the other side of that,” said Powell.

Rather than admit any part of the blame, Powell tried to lay the blame on regulation. “It’s hard to get zoning, hard to get housing built in sufficient quantity to meet the public’s demand,” said Powell.

Although zoning plays a part, cheap money and QE all the way to March of 22 is the big culprit. 

For more on Powell’s speech, please see A Hopium Stock Market Rally on Jerome Powell’s Inflation Progress Report.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

43 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
“They fly so high, Nearly reach the sky, Then like my dreams They fade and die.
Fortune’s always hiding, I’ve looked everywhere, I’m forever blowing bubbles, … “
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
“Being in Government means never having to say you’re sorry” with apologies to Erich Segal and Ali MacGraw and Ryan O’Neal.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
“Rather than admit any part of the blame, Powell tried to lay the blame on regulation. “It’s hard to get zoning, hard to get housing built in sufficient quantity to meet the public’s demand,” said Powell.”
Of course, Powell not being the sharpest tool in the shed, I suppose it would be too much for him to recognize that a major, in fact the major, reason it is hard to “get zoning”, is specifically because acts of The Fed have redistributed so much wealth, hence political influence; to idle, deadweight “owners” vastly too incompetent at anything useful to have any other means of obtaining much wealth; that those guys now are successful at influencing policy. To ensure policy is now solely targeted; not at producing housing (nor anything else of real value), but instead simply at robbing any possible value creator for the benefit of the idle, deadweight “homeowner” class.
Once you end up where the most politically influential group in society, are a gaggle of morons so retarded that they genuinely believe that shacks decaying in the weather somehow generates wealth, no production (of anything) is what you will inevitably get. Keeping the morons’ trivially idiotic illusion alive, will inevitably end up consuming all resources. Since the shacks decay more and more until they are entirely worthless as real entities. Yet the illusionists at The Fed are somehow supposed to keep not only keeping the hacks levitated, but to even increase their levitation enough to allow the leeches to “spend” “gains” at an accelerating rate as well.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Dear Stuki – You are having a bad day. Take a walk. Eat some ice cream. If need be have an adult beverage. Things are bad, but possibly not quite as bad as they seem. It is obvious that god loves imbeciles, morons and idiots as he made them in such quantity.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
God also spread the imbeciles evenly. If it was otherwise, a Darwinian event would wipe them out selectively, or save them. Either way, the Earth would be so much more habitable.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Rather than admit any part of the blame, Powell tried to lay the blame on regulation. “It’s hard to get zoning, hard to get housing built in sufficient quantity to meet the public’s demand,” said Powell.
I heard some 5 million illegal aliens have been alleged to have entered the country under Biden. Martha’s Vineyard apparently didn’t have housing space available for any.
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Reply to  RonJ
The United States would have to build a new Reno, Nevada sized city every year to accommodate adequately housing Illegal Aliens from Mexican Countries in a humane way. Liberalism seems content with them living 8 people to a one bedroom unit and the homeless being short supplied with housing. Unregulated immigration is a social and ecological disaster.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
Mexicans capable of making it across the border, are perfectly capable of building their own houses. The latter being plenty easier than the former. No “United States would have to” anything at all, other than cease to meddle and interfere.
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Are you suggesting that foreigners should be exempt from zoning laws, building codes, building permits, school fees, park fees, Sherrif fees, road fees, sewer fees, sidewalk fees, water fees and all the numerous burdens placed on America’s wanting to do as they wish on there property?
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
“Are you suggesting that foreigners should be exempt from zoning laws, building codes, building permits, school fees, park fees, Sherrif fees, road fees, sewer fees, sidewalk fees, water fees and all the numerous burdens placed on America’s wanting to do as they wish on there property?”
Yes. Of course.
Just as should Americans. It’s called freedom. Used to be popular in America, back in the civilised era.
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Lets work on Americans freedom from Bureaucratic oppression first before we give it away to others. You will not like it if America turns into Mexico City or Tijuana.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
Liberals will go to any extremes to make themselves feel better. Logic and the real world have nothing to do with it.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Greenspan mumbled something about not being able to see a bubble, until after it burst. Powell is keeping up the tradition.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
1 year ago
One point people still miss about housing is that in 2013 China made having over $50k in the bank illegal and so wealthy people in China started buying global real estate mostly in North America. That has continued unabated but now it’s also Russian money as well. There is a reason the price goes up on the chart in 2013. Inflation is a global phenomena. All those dollars propagated via US debt eventually need a home. Most people still want to come live in the US when there is a catastrophe. The smart money doest trust the Russian or Chinese government anymore.
Jack
Jack
1 year ago
This Chinese money looking for a home significantly drove real estate prices in a number of western counties – Canada, Australia, US, NZ, UK.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
I don’t believe in bubbles. Prices go up and down because of supply and demand. Sometimes demand is greater than supply and then it reverses. And then a new equilibrium price is reached. In this case, higher interest rates reduced demand at current prices.
What most view as bubbles is stupid people believing prices will keep going up forever. Failing to recognize that at a certain price point, the supply/demand dynamic changes.
In say medieval times, people thought things would continue forever, like reliable rains would last forever so no need to store food. They died when the drought hit. Helped improve the gene pool. Now, the stupid don’t die. They get bailed out or go on welfare. This is why we’re getting dumber and dumber and things like wokeness grow in popularity.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
“I don’t believe in bubbles. Prices go up and down because of supply and demand.”
The title of yesterday’s Maverick of Wall Street Youtube show was, “Investors Sell The Rip Dumping $11 BILLION Worth Of Stocks”
Supply sold into demand. There is always someone with a bag.
BDR45
BDR45
1 year ago
It was a form of insanity to lower interest rates to sub 3%. I had friends who got 2.5% 30 year fixed rate mortgages, and I told them it was like giving them the property. Interest rates by dictate distort the markets. The market should set interest rates, not the Federal Reserve. The Fed is a club of bankers who are parasitic on our economy. Real estate, in my opinion IS going to decline, but not much in nominal dollar terms. It will decline in inflation adjusted terms over the next 10 plus years or so, until there is outright deflation. Still, with WW3 on the horizon, maybe it doesn’t matter.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
Reply to  BDR45
What’s truly sad, is that The United States has now devolved so far, that whether WW3 is on the horizon or not, hardly even matters anymore…..
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
1 year ago
Bub-but-but the new home has granite countertops, stainless appliances and a misting system on the back porch! How can they not be worth what we paid???
LOL.
Sellers don’t set the price, buyers do. And nobody is a cash buyer, everyone uses debt. If the credit system collapses like I think it will, the new price for homes will be the cash price. And very few have any cash. Cash will become king again at some point.
Jack
Jack
1 year ago
Reply to  TheCaptain
No, government will just forgive all mortgage debt.
Why not, they started this trend a couple months ago – free money always more free.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
Reply to  Jack
“No, government will just forgive all mortgage debt.”
Lets hope Kim gets a big stash of warheads before that happens. Americans seem too illiterate and indoctrinated to save themselves, so we have to put our faith in someone external.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
1 year ago
Eventually there will be a glut of housing
as people die imo. I think the baby boom generation is going to deservedly go bust in retirement. Bank of America
predicting 150k jobs per month will be lost iin Q1. Once unemployment starts rising it will lead to lower or no corporate profits and lead to more job cuts. I see 2023 as a very painful year ahead. Reality of low interest era ending is going to hit home. This cycle started 20 years ago after.9/11 and Literally 90% of the growth has been due to low interest rates with meager productivity gains. The economy went from brick and mortar to online which has been a zero sum game overall.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
There is no “glut” in tennis shoes. Despite tennis players dying too. As long as a cubicfoot of air with walls and a roof around it and a lock on the door, is more valuable than a cubicfoot without, there can not possibly be any “glut.” And a cubicfoot of uncovered air in some random, nondescript place in America is, even today, pretty darned cheap to access.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
great take. love the r/e stuff. sold all my investment properties last year. will wait years to get back in. done this for a few cycles over past 35 years. i’d suggest the fed doesn’t give a hoot about much more than keeping their member and owners with free money. the bankers. but the obvious beginning of a coming long long bear market in r/e both residential and commercial will ease the feds worries, that there epic money printing under the plague years. i’m guessing when the dust does settle in next few years or decade, the banks, buddies like blackstone etc….. will be scooping up foreclosed residential properties and commercial buildings and the feeder fish like myself, that just follow the sharks and the money up and down. trading r/e is more akin to trading penny stocks imho. trading blue chips and FX and bonds much more straight forward. i do agree with MISH, this will be a very slow motion unwind due to so many factors. probably more painful for many in the slow motion. like getting a tooth pulled without laughing gas. really slow and really painful.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
It’s hard to get zoning, hard to get housing built in sufficient quantity to meet the public’s demand,
JPowell is an absolute idiot and is simply playing along with the ESG movement BS. In most areas of the US, there’s zero evidence that his statement is true. Rather, housing literally shot up so fast that many people who would have liked to have moved / up didn’t because they couldn’t afford the next house. The result was constrained existing home supply. And by end of 2019 heading into the pandemic, builders had abandoned affordable new housing in order to increase profit margins. Nowadays, multi-family townhomes are almost as expensive SF wise as their detached homes counterparts, so there’s literally zero affordable housing being built anywhere in the US. 1,600-1,800 SF townhomes in my area, Woodstock GA, now go for at least $400K. It’s insane!
JPowell, it’s not a quantity or zoning issue. It’s a price / building / developer profit issue. And in parts of GA this past spring, investors were buying up 1/3 of the homes. That’s not a zoning issue, you moron. It’s the little guy can’t compete with the investors / capital.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
you don’t really believe any FED chair ever uttered any words they actually believed, do you? telling the truth is for the little people. like paying taxes. and fighting wars and paying for money printing inflation and debt serfdom.
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
They’ll always say what they hope is true. Doesn’t mean they always lie. Sometimes what they hope is true is actually true. So, when they tell the truth, it’s just a coincidence. Not some morale drive to always be honest. Politicians follow the same mantra.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
one way of looking at it, which i cannot dispute. but the real reason is to the ancient question, cui bono. the owners of the NYFED who do the real chicanery are obvious. the rest is eyewash.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
The Ph.Ds. in economics literally don’t know a credit from a debit. The 12 boom/busts in housing since WWII were entirely the FED’s fault. Disintermediation, an economist’s word for going broke, is made in Washington (where during the GFC, the size of the nonbanks shrank by $6.2 trillion dollars, while
the banks were unaffected, increasing by $3.6 trillion dollars).
The nonbanks aren’t in competition with the banks. The NBFIs are the DFIs’ customers. Ben Bernanke destroyed the nonbanks (with Zoltan Pozar’s bad advice). That’s after the discount rate was made a penalty rate (Bagehot’s dictum). The discount rate dis-incented borrowing (as opposed to Volcker’s period). The banks suffered their first disintermediation since the GD (which was entirely the FED’s fault). Bank credit fell:
10/22/2008 @ 9245.5655 vs. 3/24/2010 @ 8602.9442 (which was reversed by FAS 166 and 167).
And the remuneration rate on IBDDs was illegal.
It’s not just the availability of funds, it’s the cost of funds (which results from the movement of savings out of the nonbanks, back to the banks).

“The term credit crunch had its origins in the unusually
tight credit conditions that prevailed in the U.S. in the late summer of 1966,
when reports of borrowers unable to obtain credit at any price were
commonplace. Prior to 1966, the postwar U.S. experienced 3 periods of tight
credit; the spring of 1953; the fall of 1957; and the last third of 1959. These
periods were called “credit squeezes” or “credit pinches”.

Sidney Homer and Henry Kaufman, economists at Salomon
Brothers in the 1960’s, coined the term “crunch” to describe how the 1966
episode differed from those in the 1950’s. Although Homer and Kaufman did not
formally define a crunch, Homer (1966) offered the following explanation:

The words squeeze or pinch have gentle connotations. The
prehensile male sometimes “squeezes” or “pinches”, with the most affectionate
intentions. No bruises need result, no pain need be inflicted. A “crunch” is
different. It is painful by definition, and it can even break bones.”

See: “Identifying Credit Crunches” by Raymond E. Owens and
Stacey L. Schreft. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, March 1993.

vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
why does most analysts always talk post ww2 stuff. like the 1930s never happened. or the worse panics before that one. this current level of money printing is similar to civil war era. could be curtains for many munis and bankers from coast to coast. the empire is crumbling. like the US civil war era. most cannot handle the really scary history. lived in charleston sc for a decade as a young man and learned a great deal. biggest take away was the loyalists kept their plantations by going to gold. and the same with the us civil war plantation owners that held on to the family property. sell the crowns money in 1700s and sell the confederate paper in 1800s. been a very long time since US has had tough economic times. 1930s the last tough medicine. glad i hold another passport and vote in the oldest empire the west knows, italia. short the roman lira.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
The banks didn’t become fully “lent up” until 1942. I.e., they carried minimal excess reserve balances after that (or before, the FED was “pushing on a string”).
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
perhaps you missed when FDR devalued the currency via the FED from 20USD to ounce of gold after a century plus, to 35USD. that’s a 75% inflation rate after making gold illegal. AFTER. i presume you know all this, as you seem very well schooled. but i believe YOUR analysis is quite simple. like majority of folks who think history started at ww2. the central bankers have always crushed the little people. and every century or so, they crush the empire they work for too. it’s an old tale that goes back thousands of years, old sport. i do thoroughly enjoy your posts, as they are insightful. hat tip to you.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
vanderlyn –
I am willing to supply you with all the capital letters (CAPITAL LETTERS) you might need and for free.
It would be most helpful to the rest of us to determine where your sentences start.
Or is your caps-lock permanently stuck in the off position?
Don’t stop writing as I very much enjoy the content of your comments, notwithstanding the pain of reading them.
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
“The Ph.Ds. in economics literally don’t know a credit from a debit.”
That’s really saying something, considering that Ph.Ds are supposed to be really highly educated. The Wizard of OZ gave the Scarecrow a diploma representing a degree in Thinkology. He probably knew the difference.
8dots
8dots
1 year ago
Price/ Rent is high. C/S was up from 136 in 2012 to 306 in June 2022. Down 2% to 299 in Sept 2022, a thud. JP, thanks for keeping us alive
during the pandemic, funding our businesses, restaurants, sending shingle mums $10K for fun. The radical 10 cities are in a bubble.
Mish
Mish
1 year ago
Live audio discussion on Twitter in a few minutes
Adam and I will discuss housing, inventories, jobs, etc.
Johnson1
Johnson1
1 year ago
Some areas are certainly in bubbles.
I am in flyover land. High end housing has been seeing price cuts but almost anything under $300k sells fast has keeps going up in price. I think Powell said in his speech to combat housing prices we need to build more houses. Most new houses in my area are in the range of $500k to $700k. LOL
I think he meant we need to build more affordable houses under $300k.
Johnson1
Johnson1
1 year ago
Reply to  Johnson1
The low end market is competing against Wall Street right now and the Robot Landlords.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
If the Federal Reserve can set rates and reserves, can it also require a 20% down payment on all cars and homes? Down payments could stabilize the financial system by encouraging borrowers to be fiscally responsible BEFORE making a large purchase that requires financing, and punishing them with a large equity loss if they default. Lenders would not lose principal foreclosing on a mortgage or repossessing a vehicle
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
1 year ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
Oh that is funny. You actually think people have money for a 20% down payment on a $500k home? n
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
The FED can absolutely do that, it is the banking regulator. However, 13 members of the committee are representatives or regional banks. Also in the pot is the home insurance. Banks would never lend to some borrowers if the loan wasn’t insured, and there comes the quasi-government insurance corporation with all sort of socially mandated insurance programs.
Get the government out of home insurance, and the housing market would look quite different.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Someone sent Jerome links to Mishtalk or Wolf Street, and he read the articles and posts going back two years, and finally realized there was a housing bubble.
Still needs to go back to re-read it as he still doesn’t recognize the culprit behind it.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.